The United States and Saudi Arabia are the perpetrators of insecurity in southern Beirut.
Lebanese political analyst Hassan Aliq reacted to recent events in southern Beirut. “What happened in Khaleda in Beirut was a premeditated security crime,” he said.
According to the report, the Lebanese political analyst added: “The United States and Saudi Arabia were the perpetrators of the recent events in Khalda.” The events in Khalda took place with the approval of Saudi Arabia and the support of the United States. The Saudis are now turning to security tensions after the political and economic sabotage in Lebanon.
Referring to the role of Riyadh and Washington in the recent events in southern Beirut, a Lebanese analyst said that the United States and Saudi Arabia are the perpetrators of insecurity in Khalda.
Lebanese political analyst Hassan Al-Aliq reacted to the recent events in southern Beirut, Mehr news agency reported, quoting al-Mayadin. “What happened in Khaleda in Beirut was a premeditated security crime,” he said.
According to the report, the Lebanese political analyst added: “The United States and Saudi Arabia were the perpetrators of the recent events in Khalda.” The events in Khalda took place with the approval of Saudi Arabia and the support of the United States. The Saudis are now turning to security tensions after the political and economic sabotage in Lebanon.
The point to consider about Hezbollah’s behavior and its reaction to the internal developments in Lebanon is that this resistance group has never used its military power to achieve its party and factional goals. , Is the collapse of this country. The United States is trying to use the events in Lebanon to put pressure on Hezbollah. Not long ago, the Khaleda area, south of the Lebanese capital, witnessed violent incidents that could have led to a major crisis.
However, the restraint of the Lebanese Hezbollah and the wise stance taken by this resistance group prevented the recent insecurity in Khaleda from leading to a widespread crisis. The reason why Hezbollah took a wise stance in the face of these events is quite clear.
It must be said that Hezbollah in Lebanon has proved that it has never preferred party and factional interests to Lebanese national interests. Over the past period, Hezbollah has shown that it has always considered the whole of Lebanon and its interests, and in the meantime, it has gone beyond its party and factional interests. From Hezbollah’s point of view, Lebanon’s interests lie in the fight against the Zionist regime, which is trying to incite sedition in the country.
The point to consider about Hezbollah’s behavior and its reaction to the internal developments in Lebanon is that this resistance group has never used its military power to achieve its party and factional goals.
Hezbollah currently has large arsenals of weapons, but in the past few decades it has refused to use this weapon power even once in the midst of internal crises.
Even though unidentified gunmen, at the instigation of foreign agents, especially by the Zionist regime, martyred a member of Hezbollah in the Khalda region, this resistance group, instead of resorting to the power of its strategic weapon, in a wise position from the army and authorities. The judiciary requested that they pursue the issue of crime in Khalda.
