The review of the documents discovered from Trump’s residence in the US Department of Justice are reviewed.
According to the announcement of American prosecutors, the US Department of Justice has completed the initial review of the documents seized by the FBI from Donald Trump’s residence.
Prosecutors in the United States revealed in a court document on Monday that the Justice Department has conducted a preliminary review of documents seized from Donald Trump’s Mar-e-Lago residence in Florida to determine if the documents are covered by the attorney-client privilege law. /Clients are finished.
The documents were seized earlier this month during an FBI raid on the Mar-e-Lago residence, and it was later reported that among them were several documents classified as “top secret”.
According to the Financial Times, authorities reviewed documents seized during the Aug. 8 raid at the Mar-e-Lago residence to see if any of them fell under the attorney-client privilege rule. or not
A few days ago, former US President Donald Trump asked the court of his country to appoint a special independent authority to determine which of these confiscated documents are
The review of the documents discovered from Trump’s residence in the US Department of Justice are reviewed.
According to the announcement of American prosecutors, the US Department of Justice has completed the initial review of the documents seized by the FBI from Donald Trump’s residence.
Prosecutors in the United States revealed in a court document on Monday that the Justice Department has conducted a preliminary review of documents seized from Donald Trump’s Mar-e-Lago residence in Florida to determine if the documents are covered by the attorney-client privilege law. /Clients are finished.
The documents were seized earlier this month during an FBI raid on the Mar-e-Lago residence, and it was later reported that among them were several documents classified as “top secret”.
According to the Financial Times, authorities reviewed documents seized during the Aug. 8 raid at the Mar-e-Lago residence to see if any of them fell under the attorney-client privilege rule. or not
A few days ago, former US President Donald Trump asked the court of his country to appoint a special independent authority to determine which of these confiscated documents are legally allowed to be read and can be used in any action against him.
But even if Florida State Judge Eileen Kannon does, as she has indicated she is willing to do, it is too late to prevent the Justice Department from being allowed to read the entire document, according to a document filed by the government on Monday. Is.
The US Department of Justice stated in the said document: “The investigation team of cases related to the advantage of the lawyer/client relationship identified a limited set of documents that potentially contain information subject to the right of confidentiality of the lawyer/client relationship and ended the review of these documents. And it is following the process of dealing with possible disputes arising from this advantage, if there are any.”
The document confirmed that the office of April Haynes, director of the US National Intelligence Service, is leading a security investigation into the documents to determine whether they pose a potential threat to US national security.
allowed to be read and can be used in any action against him.
But even if Florida State Judge Eileen Kannon does, as she has indicated she is willing to do, it is too late to prevent the Justice Department from being allowed to read the entire document, according to a document filed by the government on Monday. Is.
The US Department of Justice stated in the said document: “The investigation team of cases related to the advantage of the lawyer/client relationship identified a limited set of documents that potentially contain information subject to the right of confidentiality of the lawyer/client relationship and ended the review of these documents. And it is following the process of dealing with possible disputes arising from this advantage, if there are any.”
The document confirmed that the office of April Haynes, director of the US National Intelligence Service, is leading a security investigation into the documents to determine whether they pose a potential threat to US national security.