Israeli News Agency exposes weaknesses of the regime.

The Israeli website Yedioth Ahronoth wrote exposing the weakness of the Zionist regime and wrote:
Israel needs a coherent strategy on Iran and the Palestinians. As a regional military power, Israel must base its policy on a comprehensive assessment of national interests rather than improvisation, eliminating existential fears and the shadow of the past Holocaust.

Israel lacks a comprehensive national security policy. Its position on Iran’s nuclear aspirations was taken by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu without consulting the Security Cabinet.

Israel’s privileges, including allowing the sale of advanced weapons systems such as F-35 stealth bombers to the UAE and an agreement to license the sale of advanced submarines to Egypt, were all decided in the same way.

An Israeli Newsagency says:

As a regional military power, Israel should set policy based on a comprehensive evaluation of national interests and not by improvisation, casting off the existential fear and the shadow of the Holocaust of yore.

Israel’s concessions – allowing advanced weapons systems including F-35 stealth bombers to be sold to the UAE and an agreement to allow the sale of advanced submarines to Egypt – were all decided in the same.

The declared annexation of West Bank land and the subsequent reversal of this policy was also carried out in a similar fashion, and even the decision to deliver vaccines to certain countries and deny them to our Palestinian neighbors followed the same process.

This changing strategic reality requires a shift in the way policy is decided and adjusted. That is the only way to ensure decisions made in one sphere do not have a negative effect on other national interests.

The current method of making policy by improvisation is evident in Israel’s response to two of the greatest threats the country is currently facing: Becoming one state from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea and the Iranian nuclear program.

Since 1967, nearly all Israeli governments have avoided deciding the best path for the country’s future, refusing to choose between assimilating 2 million Palestinians into Israel’s population or to completely separate from them.

Some governments excused this indecision by claiming there was no “Palestinian partner” with whom to negotiate. Regardless of the validity of such an excuse, the result remains that the fate of the country is placed in the hands of the current or future Palestinian leadership.

This inability to make a decision and the reliance on the ongoing military rule until such time as a “partner” is found has resulted in over 50 years of gradual movement towards a future binational state.

None of Israel’s national institutions have been asked to weigh the ramifications of such an eventuality. Israel’s future security, economic stability, international standing, and regional relations were never examined in the context of one state.

Short Link

Copied