How did Sayyid Hassan Nasrallah defeated the Washington and Tel Aviv cards in the border withdrawl case?
In a speech Friday night, Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah drew a red line for the US-Zionist enemy, preventing the two sides from carrying out their plan to steal Lebanon’s maritime wealth in talks on demarcating the border between the country and occupied Palestine. .
“It is not a difficult analysis to understand the message of Seyyed Hassan Nasrallah about the demarcation of the Lebanese-Israeli border and a warning to the American-Israeli enemy to prevent the US company from exploring the disputed area with Lebanon,” the Lebanese newspaper Al-Akhbar wrote in an article. “Halliburton” was,
In fact, the Secretary General of Hezbollah, by choosing the exact words in his speech on the protection of Lebanon’s maritime wealth, succeeded in preventing the enemy from making any attempt to surrender the Lebanese to withdraw their rights in the disputed area with the Zionist regime.
But the important point to note is the timing of Seyyed Hassan Nasrallah’s choice to send this message to the American-Israeli axis; Because the Israeli-American mediation to Beirut took place at the same time as Amos Hoekstein. As the Americans try to advance the indirect negotiation process between the two sides in Israel’s favor by selecting a mediator with Israeli citizenship in the negotiations for the demarcation of the Lebanese-occupied Palestinian border, Seyyed Hassan Nasrallah strengthened the position of the Lebanese negotiating team.
Lebanese officials are still unable to take a firm stand on the talks, but the power equations established by the Resistance and Sayyid Hassan Nasrallah have prompted Lebanese officials to emphasize their maritime rights and oil and gas wealth. That is the right of all Lebanese, he is brave.
The main goal of the United States in implementing the exploration plan in the disputed area with Lebanon at sea is to prevent Lebanon from using the resources of this region to solve its economic problem and to put the Lebanese people in front of two options as in the past; Surrender to American demands or ignore your rights.
The enemy is well aware that the Hezbollah Secretary-General’s adoption of this position and his remarks on the case of the demarcation of the Lebanese-Occupied Palestinian border mean that there is a decisive decision in the process against Israel’s plans.
In fact, with the approach of the Secretary General of Hezbollah, the Zionist-American enemy has no choice but to retreat. If the enemy does not choose the option of retreat, there is little chance that Hezbollah will not take reciprocal and proportionate measures to thwart Israel’s efforts, regardless of the consequences.
In this case, the ball goes back to Israeli-American soil, and we have to see if these two sides get into a fight with Hezbollah; This is at a time when all Lebanese people have gathered around the resistance to defend their maritime wealth. It is clear that Tel Aviv and Washington do not want such a thing, and it is no secret that this is in stark contrast to the US anti-resistance plan inside Lebanon.
It is no exaggeration, then, to say that Hezbollah’s message of deterrence against the Tel Aviv-Washington efforts to plunder Lebanon’s wealth disrupted one of the most important cards of US-Israeli pressure on Lebanon.
But the issue that remains is that in the final stage, everything depends on the actions of the Lebanese officials, who must defend the Lebanese gas and oil rights with a commitment to the position of resistance.
