ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court directed the petitioner Qusin Faisal to prepare important questions on the request to stop the hateful statements against the organizations of PTI leaders including former Prime Minister Imran Khan.
Justice Yahya Afridi and Justice Ejazul Hassan of the Supreme Court heard the request for action against Imran Khan for incitement and speeches against institutions.
During the hearing, the court said that it should be satisfied which fundamental rights were affected by the hate speech, how the power of Article 184/3 of public interest can be used for the sake of a private person, the court should take notice when it deems it appropriate. Will take action.
Justice Ijaz-ul-Ahsan remarked that why should the Supreme Court hear this case, will the court take action even if someone’s feelings are hurt?
He said to the petitioner that you have given the CD of the statements but why you have not submitted the transcript, the statements must have been reported in the media, but even the reporting is being done by only a few people these days.
Justice Ijazul Hassan inquired that why should the court intervene in such cases.
Justice Yahya Afridi said that the High Judiciary has been weakened by giving statements of someone, the Supreme Court has the authority to proceed with contempt of court under Article 204, the petitioner’s job was to inform the court, you have done it. finished
He inquired whether it would have been appropriate if you had gone to another forum for proceedings.
Justice Ejaz-ul-Ahsan asked the petitioner to come with full preparation for the court questions, what did one say to the other, will the Supreme Court take action on it now.
He said that there are no transcripts of speeches or evidence with the application.
On this, the petitioner’s lawyer told the court that as a citizen, he was hurt by the statements against the institutions, on which Justice Ijaz-ul-Ahsan said that how can a case of 184/3 be made if the state violates the fundamental rights, 184 /3 becomes the case.
The petitioner said that as soon as the government left, Imran Khan and his colleagues started incitement, the judiciary, the army and the Election Commission are being weakened by speeches and statements.
Justice Yahya Afridi said that the judiciary has been weakened by Imran Khan’s statements.
The petitioner said that freedom of expression is being attacked behind the veil.
Justice Ijazul Hassan said that if the petition is admissible, then he will issue notices to the parties.
The court adjourned the hearing till the first week of September and directed the petitioner to prepare arguments while giving time to respond to the petition.
ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court directed the petitioner Qusin Faisal to prepare important questions on the request to stop the hateful statements against the organizations of PTI leaders including former Prime Minister Imran Khan.
Justice Yahya Afridi and Justice Ejazul Hassan of the Supreme Court heard the request for action against Imran Khan for incitement and speeches against institutions.
During the hearing, the court said that it should be satisfied which fundamental rights were affected by the hate speech, how the power of Article 184/3 of public interest can be used for the sake of a private person, the court should take notice when it deems it appropriate. Will take action.
Justice Ijaz-ul-Ahsan remarked that why should the Supreme Court hear this case, will the court take action even if someone’s feelings are hurt?
He said to the petitioner that you have given the CD of the statements but why you have not submitted the transcript, the statements must have been reported in the media, but even the reporting is being done by only a few people these days.
Justice Ijazul Hassan inquired that why should the court intervene in such cases.
Justice Yahya Afridi said that the High Judiciary has been weakened by giving statements of someone, the Supreme Court has the authority to proceed with contempt of court under Article 204, the petitioner’s job was to inform the court, you have done it. finished
He inquired whether it would have been appropriate if you had gone to another forum for proceedings.
Justice Ejaz-ul-Ahsan asked the petitioner to come with full preparation for the court questions, what did one say to the other, will the Supreme Court take action on it now.
He said that there are no transcripts of speeches or evidence with the application.
On this, the petitioner’s lawyer told the court that as a citizen, he was hurt by the statements against the institutions, on which Justice Ijaz-ul-Ahsan said that how can a case of 184/3 be made if the state violates the fundamental rights, 184 /3 becomes the case.
The petitioner said that as soon as the government left, Imran Khan and his colleagues started incitement, the judiciary, the army and the Election Commission are being weakened by speeches and statements.
Justice Yahya Afridi said that the judiciary has been weakened by Imran Khan’s statements.
The petitioner said that freedom of expression is being attacked behind the veil.
Justice Ijazul Hassan said that if the petition is admissible, then he will issue notices to the parties.
The court adjourned the hearing till the first week of September and directed the petitioner to prepare arguments while giving time to respond to the petition.
