Islamabad: The country’s well-known jurist and PPP leader Aitzaz Ahsan opposed the full court bench in the Deputy Speaker Dost Mazari ruling case.
According to the details, while expressing himself in a private TV program, he said that the Supreme Court said that the Deputy Speaker should come and explain on which part of the court decision he relied on, there is no need for a big bench. No, it’s a small and simple problem.
Aitzaz Ahsan said that in the first case, 25 MPs were disqualified because they voted against the party’s decision, but in this case, the MPs who voted for the Muslim League-Q cannot be disqualified because they all voted together. Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain has no role in voting in favor of the parliamentary party, no matter how hard he tried to convince his members, now what the law says is what the law says, no one can change it.
It should be noted that in the case of the ruling of the Deputy Speaker of the Provincial Assembly on the issue of the election of the Punjab Chief Minister, the government coalition decided to file a petition for a full court hearing yesterday. The decision was taken in the meeting of the parties involved in the government coalition, in the light of which the allies of the federal government filed an application in the Supreme Court to become a party. Karadi, in which it is requested that the position of PPP members present in the Punjab Assembly be heard, similarly JUIF has also filed an application to become a party in the Supreme Court, filed by Advocate Senator Kamran Murtaza. It has been requested in the petition that this is a matter of very important nature, so our position should be heard.
On the other hand, 5 former presidents of the Supreme Court Bar Association have jointly demanded from the Chief Justice of Pakistan Umar Atta Bandial that the full court hears the request for revision of the election of the Chief Minister of Punjab and the interpretation of Article 63 A. A joint statement has been issued by Muhammad Yasin Azad, Fazl Haq Abbasi, Kamran Murtaza and Syed Gulb Hasan, demanding that the full court hear the petition for review of the election of the Chief Minister of Punjab and the interpretation of Article 63A. The revision petition should be sent to the full court and the most important constitutional cases should be decided together after hearing all the parties.
