There are two general approaches to the reason for the Zionist regime’s action against the Natanz facility:
The first approach considers this action as the regime’s policy of stopping and stoning the path of negotiations. The second approach considers Israel’s action to be in agreement with the United States and to advance the negotiation process with the aim of reducing the leverage of Iran in the negotiations and reaching a weaker agreement.
In this regard, the timeline of the action, which coincided with the visit of the US Secretary of Defense to the occupied territories and after the visit of the Mossad chief to Washington and the holding of two rounds of strategic meetings between the US and Israel, shows the information and coordination of action between the two actors. It should be noted that Israel is in no way opposed to the nuclear talks aimed at curbing Iran’s nuclear power and power tools, but is trying to influence the negotiation process and take its considerations into account.
Another very important point about the Zionist regime’s policy towards Iran is the change in its strategic policy towards Iran. Traditionally, Tel Aviv has defined its actions in coordination with the United States and in a Washington-affiliated manner, but in recent years it seems that the Zionist regime has independently pursued its own policy in view of the decline of the United States and the changing role of the West Asian region. It is defining and implementing this policy towards Iran. In this regard, tactical operations controlled by this regime, with the aim of preventing a full-scale war or decisive action by Iran is on the agenda. Israeli officials assess Iran’s lack of serious response to such limited tactical measures; The recent sabotage of Natanz and similar actions such as the assassination of Shahid Fakhrizadeh are examples of this policy that will be repeated if there is no proper response.
In order to create deterrence and change the calculations of the Zionist enemy, the focal point of its new strategy must be done through clear and explicit operational action and at a larger level than its calculations to revive the deterrence of the Islamic Republic and prevent the formation of a definitive assessment and stabilize the Zionist regime.
