The New World Order from Rice Theory to Current Realities / America is trapped in the ring of global equations.
There have been many changes in the Middle East map and the balance of power in Washington over the past two decades since US leaders introduced the various strategies of the New World Order and the Greater Middle East to delineate future equations for international policymakers.
As the US government has undergone extensive changes during this period. Changes that changed the US offensive policy led by the neo-conservatives of the White House and George W. Bush Jr. after two decades to the current US defense strategy called offshore balancing, according to which the United States seeks to build regional power allied with Itself to avoid increasing the power of hostile forces in the region.
After the Arab uprisings failed miserably for the US and Saudi allies, and the political Islamist currents led by Turkey and Qatar entered the region, the United States embarked on a wave of these developments to expand relations with Turkey and Qatar evaluated and tried to pursue their popular counter-revolutions, which were followed by disrupting the general situation in Syria.
This, however, failed over the years with a series of changes in US tactics, and ultimately failed to meet the strategic goal of the United States and its allies in overthrowing the Syrian regime. Although this policy failed to achieve the main goal of the United States, it achieved the goals of the Western-Zionist center in aggravating the situation in the region as a result of the expansion of terrorist hotspots and further inflamed the situation in the Middle East.
Shortly before the ouster of Salman bin Abdulaziz in Saudi Arabia and the complete domination of Muhammad bin Salman over the Saudi governing institutions, the country had removed the case of Syria and some other axes of tension in the region from Qatar and Turkey in order to establish itself as Introduce the main factor in the implementation of US policies. The atmosphere of American political developments and the coming to power of Donald Trump, the president of the American businessman, also provided a suitable platform for the idealistic demands of Mohammad bin Salman. But the failure of the ISIL project in the region on the one hand and Trump’s failure to achieve his second term in the US presidency on the other hand plus the erosive and failed war in Yemen and the many mistakes that the Saudis made in suppressing their opponents inside and outside the country. They followed, ending the golden age of US-Saudi relations under Trump to give the US rulers of Abu Dhabi a chance.
After Joe Biden came to power in the White House, the United States put a new pragmatic policy on the agenda, raising the level of its relations with Saudi Arabia as a result of numerous cases, including the assassination of Jamal Khashgechi, a critical American journalist in Turkey, and human rights abuses in Saudi Arabia. And the Saudis’ involvement in 9/11 diminished. At the same time, some regional powers in the Persian Gulf showed greater potential to align themselves with US and Zionist policies in order to seize the position of Saudi Arabia. On the other hand, Biden seems to have changed his policy of maximum reliance on Washington’s minimal allies and is trying to strike an unwritten balance between his allies in the region, from the UAE to Qatar, Egypt and Jordan.
On the other hand, the Emirati people, with their billion-dollar expenses, tried to design a powerful lobby inside the United States. The New York Times reported that Abu Dhabi has spent several million dollars to advance US foreign policy in the direction of propaganda or political support and to influence the US election process in 2016. The Center for International Politics also released a report identifying the most important Emirati lobbies in the UAE in Washington, noting that the UAE is one of the most important foreign investors in the US economy and the country’s third largest arms customer. According to the report, the UAE has spent more than $ 20 million to connect with more than 200 parliamentary offices and 18 various US think tanks and media outlets in order to gain a positive view of these developments.
Thus, the Americans, who one day dream of conquering the region, reviving old colonialism, and strengthening the world’s unipolar system by invading Afghanistan and Iraq, have faced significant security challenges over the past two decades. The humiliating withdrawal of the US military as the world’s strongest army from Afghanistan in recent months, the reverse balance created in the unequal war of the aggressor coalition in Yemen, the inability of the Zionist regime to resolve its military disputes with resistance groups in the small and besieged Gaza Strip Also, the failure of several plans to overthrow the Syrian regime are just a few examples of the failure of US strategy in the region.
Despite hesitations in US regional policy, the opposition camp is in a favorable position, and in addition to strengthening its weight in regional strategy and balances, it has sought to strengthen Asian and Eastern coalitions to change global balances. The establishment of anti-imperialist organizations in the world, including the BRICS and Shanghai, is one of the leading components of US rivals in international equations. Traditional US alliances, including NATO and its cohesive alliance with many European governments, including France, have been severely challenged by these unbalanced policies, as exemplified by the destroyer crisis.
Thus, not only can it be said that the period of unipolarity and the history of the use of the “New World Order” and “Greater Middle East” strategies has come to an end with the emergence of new regional and global powers, but also the United States To save itself from a series of problems, it has repeatedly resorted to small and large countries to change its tactics and techniques in order to prevent the creation of a new world order that, contrary to Washington’s policies and interests in the region and the world, has increased the resistance axis. .
