The world’s superpowers are trying to make Damascus surrender to their plans by planning sanctions to pressurize Syria by hunger.
Despite the efforts of the warring countries, Syria has remained steadfast. The claim of peace and reconciliation in Syria by the foreign powers is in fact an acknowledgment of the enmity with the Syrian people that has transcended all boundaries of international humanitarian law. Yes, this battle is more difficult than a military confrontation, but Syria remains steadfast and The scene is present.
Britain has announced new sanctions against six members of the Syrian government, including Syrian Foreign Minister Faisal al-Muqaddad. The sanctions, which include a travel ban and a blockade of assets, were adopted on the tenth anniversary of the aggression and imposed war on Syria.
The sanctioned personals include Luna al-Shabal, an adviser to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, and two businessmen, Yasar Ibrahim, Mohammed Bara Qatarchi, and Malik al-Olia, the commander of the Presidential Guard, and Zaid Salah, commanders of the Syrian army.
These are the first sanctions of their kind to be imposed on Damascus under post-election British independent policy. British Secretary of State Dominique Robb, as a follower of the United States and a post-war American, strengthened Britain’s historic role by using political weapons to carry out US orders and impose economic sanctions on the Syrian people to their advantage. Defeat the people of this country and achieve illusory victories in order to cover up their military defeat.
From the Balfour Declaration to the Sykes-Picot Agreement, Britain has been at the forefront of fomenting sectarian and religious divisions in the region, with continued support for the Zionist regime and then support for armed groups. In turn, this country is trying to play a role in the disintegration that the United States has outlined for the disintegration of Syria.
Ten years after the war in Syria show that extremist ideologies of terrorist groups in Syria are consistent even with those behind suspicious humanitarian activities (white helmets), and this has led to condemnation of British behavior and all its policies in the East. The implementation of these policies takes place in the shadow of the deadly silence of the international organizations that have remained silent in the face of the sanctions against the Syrian people and have not reacted.
Undoubtedly, British foreign policy and related decisions are in line with the UK’s approach to the nations of the region. This is at a time when the regional and even international situation is moving towards political impotence and moving away from a solution, especially in relation to the Syrian crisis.
Britain’s behavior reflects political concern in Western decision-making circles to raise the sanctions ceiling and add new personalities to the sanctions. This is an emphasis on the fact that the aggressor countries are not moving towards understanding and agreeing on fundamental issues for a political solution in Syria, but rather beating the drums of confrontation with the Syrian people, especially when in this way, the ruling laws They violate international relations.
This situation has exploded the situation in Syria in the face of those countries and their alternative armies and has created real changes in the principles of conflict and war.
As the Syrian people are targeted for a piece of bread, the region is facing an earthquake that takes it away from compromise and peace.
The long lines of the Syrian people in front of the gas stations and the bakeries are a sign of the impact of the US and European sanctions on the Syrian economy, and the Syrian people are facing real economic problems. What is happening shows that the resistance in Syria is making good use of military victories and using it as a weapon in its hands to end the US and Western military presence in the region, and economic terrorism is just a kind of stupidity. It is political and a simple and obvious example of domination efforts and political stupidity and incompetence.
. All of this has forced US-affiliated countries to enter the economic confrontation in order to play their role in the region. Britain is an example of blind support for the United States, whose actions in this difficult political and economic situation are supported by the United States.
The United States is trying to use various political, economic, and security issues as principles to undermine the stability that the Syrian army and government institutions have established in Syria. Even if it costs human lives and deprives them of medicine and food. But this policy will fail and time will prove it.
