Despite the corona and the critical circumstances of the world, more than 115 political figures from 73 countries, including presidents, speakers of parliaments, prime ministers and foreign ministers, and some other ministers and dozens of prominent political figures from around the world came to the oath taking ceremony of the newly elected president.
The United States and the Israeli regime, with the help of Britain and the Arab mercenary media, are seeking to provoke world public opinion against Iran under various pretexts, one of which was the attack on an Israeli tanker off the coast of Oman last week.
The Israeli regime is trying to use this event to introduce Iran as a threat, and the United States and Britain also support this regime in this regard, and in this regard, several reasons can be considered:
First, the Israeli regime, after failing in its repeated attempts to tarnish the image of the Islamic Republic and presenting it as sometimes a nuclear and sometimes a regional threat, as well as failing to dissuade the superpowers – which are capable of Iran’s economic and scientific potential is aware – the idea of a nuclear deal with Iran has no choice but to move to a new stage where it speaks of international water security.
Second, the United States, which is unwilling to comply with the Israeli regime’s request not to consider a nuclear deal with Iran, wants to address the regime’s demands in introducing Iran as a threat in another way, such as maritime security, or from a missile program. Iran to speak, and to try to stop its development, despite the fact that Iran’s missile program is a defense program and is related to Iran’s national security and no one has the right to talk about it, especially parties such as the United States and The Israeli regime that threatens the security of the region and attacks the inhabitants of the region and occupies its lands.
Third, the United States is trying to persuade the Islamic Republic of Iran through political pressure, especially after failing to isolate Iran and limit its relations with countries in the region and fail to impose economic sanctions on the Iranian nation. Take a softer stance on the nuclear deal. This is where the United States emphasizes a “collective response” to the Israeli tanker attack, even though they have no reason to believe in the perpetrators, and it is clear that this is purely political.
Fourth, Bennett and Labid, who have struggled to overcome their current and former rival, Netanyahu, must step up their stance in the face of Israeli public opinion to rid themselves of criticism of their weakness, especially after the defeat. The recent Zionist invasion of Syria, which was the headline of the media for ten days.
Fifth: While the Israeli regime is proud of assassinating Iranian scientists and carrying out sabotage operations in the Islamic Republic, as well as attacking resistance men in Syria, why should Iran deny a successful attack on Israeli interests? Are these Israeli aggression legitimate and is Iran’s “possible” response to it haram and illegal ?!
The Israeli regime must know that Iran will respond decisively and openly if it wants to respond to its aggression. As in the case of the US assassination of General Qassem Soleimani, Iran publicly fired rockets at the US missile base in Iraq, but as for the US and its Zionist regime’s efforts to isolate Iran and present it as a threat, Widespread attendance at the inauguration of Iran’s new president, despite the crisis in Corona, indicates their defeat, and the Israeli regime and its supporters, contrary to their expectations, turned an attack by anonymous sources on the Israeli regime into an attack or threat to maritime security. They have been defeated, and the rest of the warring countries will not be willing to take part in the war, which is the war of the Israeli regime, and will not take part in a war that is of no benefit to them, unless it benefits them like the United States and Britain.
