Tehran, Damascus, and Cairo; A strategic triangle against American plans.
The countries of Iran and Syria, which have recently entered a process of Arab convergence, especially with Egypt, if they achieve political harmony, will thwart many plans of the United States and the Zionist regime for the region and the world.
“Al-Mayadeen” network website published an analytical report on the triangle of sources between Iran, Syria, and Egypt and wrote that even though there have been close and deep relations between Tehran and Cairo in recent years, the improvement of their relations at this point in time can be telling. Be a model of strategic relationships.
The failure of a plan called “Middle East in favor of Israel”
Al-Mayadeen writes in the introduction of this report: The relations between Egypt and Iran will go beyond the minimal diplomatic level and will reach the strategic level. This statement may seem strange and reprehensible considering Egypt’s participation in the “Camp David” agreement and the coldness of its relations with Iran since Cairo welcomed the deposed king, but the above conclusions or the assessment of the current stage of relations between the two countries are on the threshold of a noticeable opening. is not; An opening that has gradually replaced the previous Iranian-Arab relations at the level of the entire region.
In the continuation of this report, we read: If the first version of the Middle East and the deal of the century had fallen due to the great defeat of the occupying enemy against Hezbollah in Lebanon in 2006, as well as the perseverance of Syria after the black decade and the intensification of popular resistance in occupied Palestine, we would have witnessed a more dangerous version. We were one of the consecutive projects in the Middle East that appeared in huge projects in two directions. The direction that connects the Zionist enemy to the Persian Gulf through Jordan and connects the Persian Gulf region to Turkey through Iraq; But the dangerous points and goals of this project are:
– Isolating Iran by marginalizing the role of the Strait of Hormuz from world trade and oil
– Isolating Egypt by marginalizing its role in the Suez Canal
– Isolating Syria on its important land and sea borders and routes to Europe
– connecting the first route of the Persian Gulf and Tel Aviv to the port of Haifa; What Syria witnessed during the black decade of terrorism and then the bombing of Beirut was a prelude to the progress of the Zionist regime in this direction.
Al-Mayadeen further wrote: The new Middle East plan, but its new economic-political maps, was pursued through a combination of railways, ports, international land roads, and open and closed water channels. A plan that sought to replace the ports that exist on the coasts of occupied Palestine, such as Haifa and Ashkelon, with the role of the Suez Canal and the Strait of Hormuz; Ports that all form the northern arteries of the Saudi “Neom” project.
