Why is the US Congress boasting about Nuclear deal?
In the eyes of a group of American lawmakers, merely opposing Borjam and questioning its future could limit Iran’s chances of economic benefit from the deal.
US officials have repeatedly tried in recent months to make the speed of the Vienna talks conditional on Iran taking action, while growing evidence suggests that internal strife in the United States has been at least part of the timing of the US negotiating team at the Coburg Hotel.
Over the past few months, U.S. lawmakers, mostly Republicans, have sought to impose their political opposition to nuclear deal in a variety of ways, including by writing to law enforcement officials, introducing plans to force the US government to seek congressional approval, and holding various meetings. Express publicly.
Of course, based on what can be deduced from the US’s 6 years of experience in implementing Borjam, this kind of dissent can not be seen as a full reflection of the real concerns of this group of politicians about nuclear agreement, but rather, they are sometimes part of a broader strategy and are all pursuing against Iran.
In other words, such oppositions are sometimes more self-serving than seeking other goals. In the eyes of a group of American lawmakers, merely opposing the deal and questioning its future could limit Iran’s chances of economic benefit from the deal. The group believes that anti-nuclear deal tools can also be a good bargaining chip for US negotiators in Vienna.
On the other hand, such oppositions apply to members of the Republican Party in domestic political conflicts in the United States. Representatives of the Republican Party know that they can settle the necessary political accounts with Biden in the run-up to the midterm elections by challenging the Biden administration.
